In January I analyzed General
Dynamics (GD) and United
Technologies (UTX) as potential additions to my Dividend Farm. I did so because I was looking for another
manufacturer to beef up that segment of my portfolio. GD and UTX were under review because both are
members of the CCC and they are aerospace firms in an industry in which I’m
partial. However, I’m not partial to the
extent I’ll make a poor purchase decision; at least not intentionally.
The pictures painted for GD and UTX, although not perfect, aren’t
terrible and left me feeling I needed to keep an eye on each. Consequently, I thought I’d better also review
Deere & Company (DE) since it’s the only holding I own that I would
consider a manufacturer.
The table below provides a summary of factors I consider as applied to Deere & Company on February 4, 2019. Laying out my analysis like this helps me quickly benchmark against my target metrics and compare this firm to alternatives.
FACTOR
|
METRICS
|
COMPANY
|
CCC List
|
Champion
|
N/A
|
Current Yield
|
4.0%
|
1.85%
|
Company Profile
|
Red Flags
|
Tractors, Forestry, Finance
|
Industry Leadership
|
Top 10
|
#1
|
Market Cap
|
$10 B+
|
$52.6 B
|
P/E
|
< 20
|
22.7
|
P/B
|
< 2
|
4.6
|
Debt / Equity
|
< 1
|
8.8
|
Dividend History
|
25 Years
|
Cuts 1995, 2007
|
12 Month Price Range
|
Lower Half
|
Top 20%
|
Dividend Payout Ratio
|
< 75%
|
35.6%
|
Portfolio Weight
|
Slightly Over
|
Under
|
The first column lists factors I review. The middle column lists target benchmarks for
those factors. The last column
highlights Deere’s metrics so I can see how well they align with my benchmarks.
CCC List: The DRIPinvesting.org
web site provides the list of Champions, Contenders, and Challengers which is
where I normally start. It turns out
that DE is not currently listed as it experienced dividend cuts in 1995 and
2007, per Yahoo Finance, as well as several years since then in which the
dividend was static i.e., no growth. This
is definitely not a good start for a current holding; makes me wonder if other
factors were highly favorable when I first acquired it.
Current Yield: DE’s yield is at 1.85%. It sports a $3.04 annual payment having
tripled its payout since the 2007 cut, but it’s less than half my desired
target yield target.
Company Profile: As a Dividend Farmer, I do like the field in
which Deere operates. Headquartered in
Illinois, producing great agricultural equipment, some of which I operated as a
young man; forestry gear, and financing for all, it appears to participate in a
steady, if unspectacular segment. I
found no significant red flags.
Industry Leadership: I’m interested in companies in the Top 10
within their industry. Statista listed DE
as the largest producer of agricultural equipment in the United States. That’s good.
Market
Capitalization: DE stands at $52.6 B
which is more than sizable enough for comfort.
Price to Earnings: The trailing P/E is at 22.7 which is more
than 10% above the upper end of my target range.
Price to Book: P/B is more than twice my intended benchmark.
Debt to Equity: D/E is nearly 9x over my preferred point. That’s definitely concerning.
Dividend History: Although it’s got a long history of dividend
payments, 2 cuts in the past 25 years aren’t a good sign for a long-term buy
and hold Dividend Farmer.
Price Range: The price is on the high side of its 12 month
trailing range coming in at about the 80th percentile. It’s not a bargain at the moment.
Payout Ratio: The payout ratio is favorable at 35.6%. DE has raised its quarterly dividend payment
from $0.60 to $0.76 since last March.
This represents growth approaching 27%, which is fantastic. Although the payout ratio can obviously
support additional increases, that kind of growth is unlikely to be sustained.
Portfolio
Distribution: As mentioned earlier,
DE is my only manufacturer representing the second smallest sector in my
portfolio.
Analysis
DE isn’t looking good right now missing
on 7 of my twelve benchmarks shown in red in the table. It certainly wouldn’t be an addition today
given its state. Although I don’t want
to make a rash decision and dump a stock that may do well in the long run, I need to consider whether or not it’s worth the hold. I’ll stack it next to GD and UTX to see how
they compare. Who knows, I might get to
add aerospace to my holdings yet. Not
that doing so is the deciding factor, but it’s nice to get extra frosting with
the dividends once in a while.
The thoughts and
opinions expressed here are those of the author, who is not a financial
professional. Opinions expressed here should not be considered investment
advice. They are presented for discussion and entertainment purposes
only. For specific investment advice or assistance, please contact a
registered investment advisor, licensed broker, or other financial
professional.
No comments:
Post a Comment