Saturday, April 27, 2019

Div Tip #3: Transactions costs kill.

Photo of Dividend Tip Jar.
Dividend Tips

Transactions costs compound over time -- in a negative way.  Every time I buy or sell a stock a small portion of that transaction is quietly siphoned from my portfolio.  The more transactions there are, the harder my investments have to work (the more compounding they need to deliver) to overcome the transaction loss.  This reduces the likelihood of success.

Buying good dividend paying stocks and holding them long-term means enjoying the positive compounding of dividends without the negative compounding effect of the transactions costs.  Losing even 1% in unnecessary transactions means extra years to reach my goal or worse, falling short altogether.

Thursday, April 25, 2019

Slaves to Credit

Borrower is slave to lender graphic.
Proverbs 22:7

Biblically speaking, one should avoid borrowing.  Proverbs 22:7 says the borrower is slave to the lender.  If that isn’t the truth, I’m not sure what is.  According to USA Today the average American carries $6,354 in credit card debt.  CreditCards.com notes the average card interest rate recently hit 17.69%.  

So what does this mean as a Dividend Farmer?  It can mean losing Seed Money and a future crop that may have grown from it. 

If a family carrying the average credit card balance at the mean (pun intended) interest rate plans to pay it off in 5 years, assuming they don’t continue adding to the debt, they’ll pay $160.28 per month.

That payment doesn’t sound too bad.  However, over the course of 60 months they’ll repay the $5,000 credit card loan plus another $3,262 in interest!  That’s $8,262 they gave a card issuer and don’t have for Dividend Farming purposes.

Hypothetically speaking, had that family instead been able to save $5,000 rather than spending it through a credit card, they would be well ahead.  In addition, investing their $160 monthly credit card payment in a dividend stock with a 4% yield, compounding quarterly, improves the position further.  They would have finished with $9,624 at the end of the period – nearly double what they spent on the credit card in the first place.

More importantly, the difference between paying the credit card company $8,262 dollars over 5 years instead of paying themselves $9,624 within the same time frame represents a swing of $17,886.  In other words, spending on the credit card left our family nearly $18,000 behind where they might have been had they instead chosen to save and invest.

When people are behind the savings curve to this extent they truly are slaves to lenders.  It’s challenging to save for an emergency, let alone the future, when the math against a borrower is crystal clear.  

I understand emergencies and unexpected expenses compel folks to accept credit card debt.  However, mocha lattes and similar frills don’t fit the emergency category, helping people dig farther into debt gulch.  This is when they violate the Proverb above and become a slave to the lender.

Dave Ramsey tip of the day.
Dave Ramsey Tip
The greater the debt, the stronger the shackles.  If you’re financially indebted to another, your freedom is compromised.  If so, maybe it’s time to find another path.  Check out Dave Ramsey’s Financial Piece University for thoughts on a new course.  I've taken it and found it valuable.  It can be baby steps from there toward your own Dividend Farm.

Thoughts expressed here are those of the author, who is not a financial professional.  These opinions should not be considered investment advice.  They are presented for discussion and entertainment purposes.  For specific investment advice or assistance, please contact a registered investment advisor, licensed broker, or other financial professional. 

Wednesday, April 24, 2019

Div Tip #2: Be selective with diversity.

Dividend Tips Jar
Dividend Tips

Buying an index fund with hundreds or thousands of firms means buying a lot of under performing issues.  Counting on a handful of overachievers to carry the mass of laggards is tough sledding.

It’s better to select a smaller number of high quality companies to achieve the needed diversity while avoiding the mass of underachievers.
 
The universe of high quality dividend champions, contenders, and challengers is big enough to provide investment diversity while allowing me to select the steady performers I want.  Consequently, it’s possible to avoid buying the chaff and focus my investment dollars on more valuable dividend crops.

Tuesday, April 23, 2019

Div Tip #1: Think incremental gains; not big wins.

Dividend Tips

Small wins often come with reduced risk.  Those wins compound over time.  Their associated risks don’t. 

It’s easier to generate mini-wins consistently than it is to hit big repeatedly.

Strong dividend paying companies provide the small wins with lower risk over time I’m looking for.  The dividend payments compound delivering consistency and stability.  Managing risks rather than returns this way generates a solid, long-run payoff.

Thoughts expressed here are those of the author, who is not a financial professional.  These opinions should not be considered investment advice.  They are presented for discussion and entertainment purposes.  For specific investment advice or assistance, please contact a registered investment advisor, licensed broker, or other financial professional.  


Saturday, April 20, 2019

Managing Investment Risk


"Rule #1:  Never Lose Money.  Rule #2:  Never Forget Rule #1." 
-Warren Buffett

"The key to success [in investing] lies in avoiding losers, not in searching for winners."
- Howard S. Marks

The wisdom above is important for any investment operation.  As a DIY investor working toward a better future for my family, I keep these things in mind.  Risk is inherent in everything we do.  It’s our job to mitigate that risk while enjoying life.  We don’t eliminate the risk of an accident by not driving cars; we drive defensively and wear seatbelts.  Vacation travel risk isn’t diminished by foregoing air transport but by flying well-regulated air carriers.

If we follow the advice of Buffett and Marks when investing, we don’t do so by refusing to invest.  Instead, we find ways to reduce investing risks.  The aviation reference above provides an apt launch point for investment risk management.

The flying world has over a century’s worth of experience developing risk assessment and management techniques.  The chart below is a risk assessment template from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA).  It maps the probability of an event (hazard) to the severity of its occurrence to assign a risk level. 

 
FAA Risk Assessment Matrix
Aviation Risk Assessment Matrix (Federal Aviation Administration)

An activity or event with a high probability of happening and a large consequence are the conditions aviators work to modify or avoid.  By reducing the chance of occurrence, the magnitude of the consequence, or both; or avoiding the condition entirely, pilots and air crew make flying safer.  The great thing about this assessment tool is it requires flyers to think through risks and mitigation options while giving them a visual queue helping improve aeronautical decision making.

Knowing this, I thought it would be interesting to apply similar methods to investment decision making.  Below is a risk assessment chart approximating my risk thought process when making investment decisions.  I judge the probability of each factor happening as well as the severity of the consequences if it does.  It’s similar to the FAA’s chart, but with less granularity.  You could make your chart as granular as you like by listing event probability in 10% increments, for example, or by scaling the same event’s severity from 1 to 10 with 10 being worst case.  For the purposes of this post, I’m keeping it simple.

Probability / Severity
Small
Medium
Large
High



Medium



Low




My assessment of likelihood and severity is often subjective, but that’s true of nearly all risk exercises.  However, the effort makes me think through my decisions and, with experience derived from repetition, I believe my decisions improve. 

I can see my decision criteria should fall within the green zone while avoiding the red.  Yellow zones are somewhat transitional and can lend support one way or another.  If the factor is trending toward the red, or several other factors are already in the red, then a yellow zone factor is likely to lean toward not investing.  Conversely, if many factors are already green or trending that way, I might accept a factor in the yellow zone.  This is particularly true if I think a yellow zone item is trending toward green as well.

Another way to think about this exercise is to consider whether a risk can be mitigated.  Suppose I find a small company I believe may be a good investment, but I’ve assessed one of its investment factors in the red. What, if anything, can I do about the risk? 

Instead of investing in a small company, I might invest in a similar, larger company in the same field.  Company size generally reduces the risk a firm goes out of business. 

Alternatively, I may decide to invest only a portion of my funds in the target company while putting the rest in another investment vehicle.  This way I don’t put all my eggs in one basket reducing risk through diversification. 

There are a variety of ways to reduce or avoid risk in investing.  I just have to take the time to think them threw.  Having good tools to help me do so improves my investment decision making and my returns in the long run.

“The essence of investment management is the management of risks, not the management of returns.”
-Benjamin Graham

The trick is figuring out how to manage my investment risks.  Aviation enterprises work hard to ensure   people don’t get hurt.  Taking a page from the industry’s playbook and applying it to investing is a good start.
  
The thoughts and opinions expressed here are those of the author, who is not a financial professional.  Opinions expressed here should not be considered investment advice.  They are presented for discussion and entertainment purposes only.  For specific investment advice or assistance, please contact a registered investment advisor, licensed broker, or other financial professional.  

Thursday, April 18, 2019

Dividend Farming Scorecard: Proctor & Gamble (PG)

P&G logo
Growing dividends for 62 years.

I’ve been farming dividends for several years.  One of my dividend producers is Proctor & Gamble (PG).  I’ve held it for a while and know it’s time to review it to determine whether or not to continue farming it or replace it with a different cash crop.

The following table provides a snapshot of factors I’m scoring for PG as of April 17, 2019.  Laying out my analysis helps me benchmark a holding or opportunity against target metrics.  It also allows me to compare this firm to alternatives as part of my review process.  As a general rule, I pull the bulk of my financial data from Yahoo Finance.

FACTOR
METRICS
PROCTOR & GAMBLE
CCC List
Champion
Champion
Current Yield
4.0%
2.76%
Company Profile
Red Flags?
Treasury stock?
Industry Leadership
Top 10
#2
Market Cap
$10 B+
$264.8 B
P/E
< 20
25.7
P/B
< 2
4.99
Debt / Equity
< 1
1.3
Dividend History (Years)
25
62
12 Month Price Range
Lower Half
Near Top
Dividend Payout Ratio
< 75%
69.1%
Portfolio Weight
Slightly Over
Slightly Over

CCC List: The DRIPinvesting.org web site provides the list of Champions, Contenders, and Challengers where I normally start.   (PG) is a Dividend Champion with 62 straight years of dividend growth!  How do you top that?  It’s likely there are fewer than a dozen firms with a track record of equal or greater length.

Current Yield:  Proctor’s yield is 2.76% which is less than 75% of my target yield.  If I were considering PG as a purchase, I’d look closely at the strength of other metrics before making a buy decision.

Company Profile:  PG is well-regarded and widely known for providing name-brand goods in beauty, grooming, health, household products, and various family consumables segments.  PG brands include but are not limited to Gillette, Crest, Cascade, Swiffer, Pampers, Charmin, and a host of others.

Industry Leadership:  Consultancy UK lists PG as the #2 consumer goods company in the world and #1 in the US by revenue.  PG trails only Nestle (world) and is ahead of Pepsico (US) as of September 2018.

Market Capitalization:  At $264.8, PG’s market cap coupled with its diverse brand line-up offers tremendous stability.

Price to Earnings:  The trailing P/E of 25.7 is above my range indicating investors may be reaching a bit.

Price to Book:  The P/B is nearly 2.5x my target.  The good will, blue sky, or whatever you might call it is far and away the largest asset on the balance sheet by nearly 2:1.

Debt to Equity:  Debt to equity isn’t as bad as I feared, but at 1.3 is still above my target.

Dividend History:  Growing dividends for 62 years is remarkable.  This is an important factor for Dividend Farmers.  However, I’m not sure that span would recommend a buy decision given other data points.

Price Range:  The price is within less than $1 of its trailing 12-month (TTM) or 52-week high with a $36 dollar span – not a bargain.  However, that does explain to a degree the P/E and P/B metrics which aren’t favorable on their own.

Payout Ratio:  At 69.1% the payout ratio is in-range.  Given the 62-year string of consecutive increases, there’s no reason to think it won’t make it to 63 or more, which is good.

Portfolio Distribution:  PG is a strong, but not overweight holding in my basket.  Coupled with other consumer goods firms in the fold, however, PG would tilt the whole thing too far in the consumables direction if I add more now.

Analysis  
Of the companies reviewed the past several months (PG) didn’t score as well as I expected.  I believe the price may be rich due in part to the number of institutional investors required to have it in their portfolios e.g., index funds, ETFs, etc., all of which can drive excess demand producing an overbought issue. 

The price may not fall far enough to make it a buy at this time, but I already have it in my portfolio so purchasing isn’t a consideration.  There are some blemishes but no heart-stopping red flags.  The inherent stability of the offering means there’s little potential for a fire sale in the foreseeable future.  PG went ex-dividend yesterday with a May 15 payout date so I may as well hold it and enjoy another distribution and reinvestment continuing the compound growth vital to Dividend Farmers.    

The thoughts expressed here are those of the author, who is not a financial professional.  Opinions should not be considered investment advice.  They are presented for discussion and entertainment purposes only.  For specific investment advice or assistance, please contact a registered investment advisor, licensed broker, or other financial professional.

Monday, April 15, 2019

Dividend Farming Scorecard: AT&T (T)


I’ve been farming dividends for several years.  One of my favorite dividend producers is AT&T (T).  AT&T has taken a lot of heat lately for its debt load and its general lack of market growth.  Consequently, I thought I’d review it to see if it should remain on the farm.

The table provides a snapshot of factors I’m scoring for T as of April 12, 2019.  Laying out my analysis helps me benchmark a holding or opportunity against target metrics.  It also allows me to quickly compare this firm to alternatives as part of my screening process.

FACTOR
METRICS
AT & T
CCC List
Champion
Champion
Current Yield
4.0%
6.45%
Company Profile
Red Flags?
Debt Load.
Industry Leadership
Top 10
#2
Market Cap
$10 B+
$233.9 B
P/E
< 20
11.3
P/B
< 2
1.3
Debt / Equity
< 1
1.8
Dividend History (Years)
25
35
12 Month Price Range
Lower Half
Upper Half
Dividend Payout Ratio
< 75%
70.5%
Portfolio Weight
Slightly Over
Slightly Over

CCC List: The DRIPinvesting.org web site provides the list of Champions, Contenders, and Challengers where I normally start.   (T) is a Dividend Champion with 35 straight years of dividend growth which is a great place to jump off.

Current Yield:  T’s yield is 6.45% which is more than 50% above my desired target.  Having a few dividend payers like this can help raise the average yield on the portfolio a few tenths of a percent reducing my time to double the dividend income stream.  Even better if the financial metrics don’t make it look like a risky, high yield holding.

Company Profile:  T is mostly known for delivering landline and wireless communication services.  However, it also owns DirecTV and WarnerMedia allowing it to provide content and streaming services.

Industry Leadership:  Investopedia lists T as the #2 communications company in the U.S. based upon customer count and market capitalization.

Market Capitalization:  At $233.9, T’s market cap provides considerable stability which reduces risk.

Price to Earnings:  The trailing P/E of 11.3 is well within my range indicating investors aren’t overpaying for T’s future income stream.

Price to Book:  The P/B ratio of 1.3 is solid.  While it’s great to find a bargain for which I’d pay pennies on the dollar, paying pennies over a dollar for something delivering a yield above 6% is something I can readily live with.

Debt to Equity:  Debt to equity is nearly double my target and the reason for the red flag.  It’s also one reason T may not be a Wall St. favorite.  On the bright side, T made significant debt payments in 2018 and indicated it will continue that trend in 2019.

Dividend History:  Growing dividends for 35 years is not an easy task, but T appears to be in position to continue that trend into the future.  This is an important factor for Dividend Farmers.

Price Range:  The price is in the upper half of its trailing 12-month (TTM) range.  The range is fairly small – about $9 and the price isn’t rich by any stretch.  As a result, being in the upper half, while not ideal, isn’t a show stopper.

Payout Ratio:  At 70.5% the payout ratio is approaching my 75% target ceiling.  For some investors this indicates little room for dividend growth, but at 6.45% I’m not really looking for more.  Besides, the firm has managed small increases for 35 years.  I see no reason it can’t continue with minor increases for several years to come.

Portfolio Distribution:  T is a substantial holding in my basket.  Whether or not I’ll add more as investment funds become available is questionable.  While I like (T) I don’t want to go far overweight, particularly when other sectors of my portfolio are currently light.

Analysis  
Of the companies reviewed the past several months (T) has scored well across the board – better than the rest.  Although the debt load is higher than desired, it’s still manageable and the firm is working to bring it down further.  Given other, healthy metrics, (T) would be a solid add if I didn’t already have plenty in my kit.  I won’t be selling it any time soon while allowing the dividend stream to continue compounding.  At 6.45% the position will double in just over 11 years if it continues.  Knowing that helps this Dividend Farmer reach F.I.R.E – Financial Independence, Rest Easy.

The thoughts expressed here are those of the author, who is not a financial professional.  Opinions should not be considered investment advice.  They are presented for discussion and entertainment purposes only.  For specific investment advice or assistance, please contact a registered investment advisor, licensed broker, or other financial professional.