This series (here,
here,
here,
and here)
may feel long, but not as long as the 11 years required to take a bath on this
venture. Many investors think property
management is the panacea to their rental headaches. I’ll discuss why that may not be so.
At first blush, Blue seemed like a good idea. They would receive 10% of the rent to take
care of everything: property showing, background checks, repairs, the whole
shebang. What could go wrong? One should never ask that question. Ever.
For starters, Blue required a $250 maintenance account held
by them at all times. They would have
discretion on minor repairs and expenses, below $250, and would provide notice
if an expense greater than $250 was required.
What this meant was that Blue would make minor changes and
repairs not otherwise approved and deduct the expense from the account. They would send a bill stating the repair
account fund needed replenishment. This
happened frequently, giving Blue a nickel and dime vehicle each month.
Also, it became apparent the vendors to which Blue
outsourced repairs and refurbishment were billing higher than market
rates. I’m sure this was a requirement to
get Blue a cut as middleman. Instead of
dealing with renter and contractor headaches directly for $X there was a different,
yet similar set of headaches with Blue to enjoy while payed $X plus.
To put salt in the wound, Blue would collect the rent from
the renter the first of the month, but wouldn’t take their 10% and pay out the
balance until after the 20th of the month. The property note was due the first of the
month. Blue enjoyed the “float” of an interest
free loan on the rental income for three weeks before releasing the balance of
funds.
Needless to say the Blue contract lasted the year for which
it was signed. Afterwards, activity
reverted to self-management from whence it came.
We’re on the home stretch now. Rental real estate freedom is in the next
post!
No comments:
Post a Comment